31 May 2009

UKIP vs Science, II

Earlier this week I mentioned a flyer which had UKIP's MEP candidates from the Yorkshire/Lincolnshire region.

I said that the flyer showed that UKIP campaigned against evolution and climate change, which resulted in an angry response from their press office.

Well it appears that I was in fact correct to say that denying climate change was their policy. The Lay Scientist and the Science Punk have recently written to the main parties regarding their policies on various science topics, including climate change.

They asked the following question:
How will you use a seat in the European Parliament to tackle climate change and its impact on the UK?
and UKIP's reply is reported as follows
[press officer] Tim Worstall's response [unfortunatley not on the Lay Science article] to us suggested a lack of any real policy, and there is a hint of climate denialism about the UKIP party.
Oh dear!

UPDATE: UKIP's reply is now up on Lay Science.

UPDATE: ... as is each party's response to each question.

Why the _______s Hate the _______s

Found this article in the Village Voice via A Tiny Revolution, which deserves more than just a link:
A Guide to Ethnic and Religious Strife Through All Human History

1. They stole our _______!

2. At the Battle of _______ in the _______ Century, they used unfair tactics to defeat us. We cannot rest until the souls of our dead are avenged.

3. Their religion is absurd. Offensive, really—did you know they actually believe __________? And they won't be happy until EVERYBODY believes it!

4. While it's not "politically correct" to say so, science has proven them to be _______.

5. They smell weird.

6. They live like animals. Children, education, the future—none of these matter to them.

7. Their music is primitive, and encourages people to _______.

8. Can you believe they eat _______? Think about that for a second—they actually put _______ in their MOUTHS.

9. They want to sully our women.

10. There are so many of them—all they do is _______! If we're not careful, someday soon we'll be submerged beneath a flood of ________!

11. If there's anything worse than a _________, it's a _________-lover. These traitors are trying to destroy us from within.

12. Sure, there are a few good _________s. But better safe than sorry.

13. Yes, we killed ________ of them. You can't expect them to understand it was in self-defense—they're totally irrational. Sooner or later, they will seek revenge, and when they do, we must be prepared to kill more. That's the only language they understand.

14. Of course we seem prejudiced. The media is obviously pro-_______.

15. They're the reason we're so unhappy.
Even though it dates from 2002, it is still a handy guide to help show why #theBNParetwats amongst other things.

29 May 2009

The Sun Lies: Sun supports Pseudoscience II

I've have another new post over on the Sun Lies.

For the second time in as many days, it's about the Sun promoting pseudoscience, only this time it uses a desperate old man.

Nadine Dorries's memory hole

It's well-known that Nadine "#sackDorries" isn't a big fan of criticism.

It's now been shown that she is more than willing to attempt to cover-up her tracks when she attacks her opponents:

Yesterday, she had a post on her blog attacking the Labour candidate in her constituency and disputing that he ever served fought in Iraq. This morning Tim Ireland (@Bloggerheads) noticed that it had been replaced. Thankfully, @Wireman managed to retrieve it from the Google cache.

The original, now deleted article was the following:
My Labour opponent had a very strong letter in the Beds On Sunday this week.

In the letter he deployed his usual tactic of distorting the facts, something I’m becoming used to these days; however, he also said:

"I fought for as a soldier in Iraq in 2003".

Anyone who reads my blog will know how pro-military I am.

I stand in awe and admiration of our soldiers, their professionalism and bravery.

Only last week, I wrote of how moved I was when I heard a Scots Dragoon Guard use his moment on TV to talk about the moment a soldier receives his pre-assignment message: 'contact with the enemy is certain' - and what it is that fires that soldier on, one of our heroes, into battle.

So, you can imagine, when I read the words "I fought as a soldier in Iraq" I was quite impressed. Gosh, thought I, good job I’m the MP or I may be tempted to vote for him myself.

Only, did he fight in Iraq? Did he go out into the danger zones along with the a regiment on Op Telic 8, and risk his life and limb side by side with our soldiers, for the sake of freedom and democracy? The values for which he claims to have "fought in Iraq".

I will be interested to find out the answer.

Claiming to be a hero when you write a political letter as the Labour candidate in a newspaper is a very big claim indeed. One that secures advantage and wins you votes.

Let’s hope it’s true.
It now shows the following:
The local press are picking this up now, I will leave it up to them.

Anyone who reads this blog will understand that I have the hugest regard for all serving military personnel, TA, Army, Navy and Air Force and consider myself very lucky indeed to have two bases in my constituency. RAF Henlow, Chicksands and a TA training base.

I talk to many soldiers, regular and TA before they leave to serve, and as detailed in my blog, 'A Soldiers Tale', when they arrive home. I know and understand well exactly the danger and the operations they engage in.

However, the one thing I have learnt over the last few weeks is that in the battlefield of politics, one needs to be absolutely honest AND precise. Nothing less will do.
As you can see there is a massive difference - she has removed all traces of her attack.

Please, Dave, #sackDorries.

UPDATE: Mike Power has a pdf copy of the original post.

UPDATE: Amended slightly in light of comment from Mike Power re Nadine's claims.

28 May 2009

Billy Brit; the racist sh!t

Just noticed that I've not yet mentioned this.

Tim Bloggerheads in response to (as they are known on Twitter) #theBNParetwats has done a video taking the piss out of their very poor-quality propaganda which is aimed at little kiddies:



Yay for Tim!

27 May 2009

The Sun Lies: Sun supports Pseudoscience

I have a new post over on the Sun Lies.

This time I have a go at a blatant piece of advertising for pseudoscience that is very thinly dressed-up as a health and science article.

Summary: I'm not impressed.

26 May 2009

The Magic Number

I've just received an email for a further donation to my political campaign.

I NOW HAVE OVER £500.00 IN FUNDS AND PLEDGES!

As I now have a enough for the deposit, I've updated to thermometer to aim for £1,000.00 which would go towards other expenses.

UKIP vs Science

Thanks to the Lay Scientist comes a campaign leaflet from UKIP.

The two people named on the leaflet actually are UKIP MEPs and so presumably it's official.

It's a lie to say that evolution is accepted in the US but nowhere else - the opposite is true:

The les said about their position on global warming the better...

What's next? UKIP taking a shot at gravity?

25 May 2009

Xtranormal

Thanks to the Flying Rodent, I've discovered Xtranormal - a very easy way to create short CGI films.

For my first film, I've decided to take my post "How MPs should claim their expenses" and have converted it into a little speech which I've published on Xtranormal and YouTube.



This may be a very good way to spread the word.

24 May 2009

Fund-raising at-a-glance

So that people can see how my political campaign is going, I've added a fund-raising thermometer to the blog. It'll be updated whenever I get a payment or a pledge.

Thanks to @JimBarker for the idea.

Smith: no vote on DNA database

From the Observer:
Jacqui Smith, the home secretary, has been warned that the government risks further damaging the public's faith in politics after it emerged that plans for the police to keep innocent people's DNA profiles for up to 12 years will become law without a Commons vote.

Opposition parties and civil liberty groups united to condemn plans that are being steered through parliament while MPs are distracted by the expenses row.

The Conservatives and the Liberal Democrats claim the government is seeking to make controversial changes to the national DNA database via a "statutory instrument" because it fears losing a vote that would be required if they were introduced by the more conventional method of primary legislation.
I thought the innocent have nothing to fear? If so, what's the government to worry about from a vote?

23 May 2009

Economics and the NHS

Over on my election wiki on They Want To Work For You, I've started the sections on economics and the NHS.

As ever, your views and suggestions are welcome.

Join my Facebook group

I've created a Facebook group for my ultimately-futile political career.

Please join!

22 May 2009

I get email

Just noticed this in my email:
Compliment of the day to you my name is Gary Loopy finance manager Bank of Scotland,i am contacting you to seek your partnership in a pending business project which i have here in my hand and ready to be executed without hitches,i would give to you a more detailed explanation of this project which i prefer to call a deal if i get yourpositive response in agreeing to partner with me since this business is 100% risk free because i have all the modalities fashioned out to give this business an excellent outcome.

In an attempt to trow light on this business deal,a month ago a Bahrain multinational company opted an overdraft from our bank and it was over invoiced with an amount of Six Million Pounds,thus i seek your partnership to enable me transfer this funds to your account for both of us and i am open to negotiate your percentage so far you put in your utmost attention and sincerity due to the nature of the business.
Note to future potential scammers: if you're going to pretend to have an English name, it helps if you come across as being literate.

How MPs should claim their expenses


I've just created this as a handy guide as to how MPs should decide whether they should claim something on expenses.

Needless to say, when I (hopefully) get elected, I will follow this every time!

21 May 2009

Wiki-election

As a way to try and boost my already-flagging campaign, a wiki has been set up on Wikia by TheyWantToWorkForYou. It's very basic at the moment, but will be updated with what my policies would be as soon as I get around to it.

If anyone has any views they're more than welcome to leave comments and constructive edits on it.

20 May 2009

Help fund my campaign

In the first post of my campaign, I made a request for funds. I was discussing this with a friend last night and he suggested that I put some of my own money up front, effectively putting my money where my mouth is. I'm happy to pledge £100.00 and have a pledge of up to another £75.00, but clearly I do not have anywhere near what I need to run a campaign.

Therefore, I've set up a pledge on Pledge Bank to obtain funding for my run as an MP (thanks to TWTFY for the tip):
"I will stand for Parliament and pledge £50.00 towards the costs but only if 10 other people will do the same." — Gareth Winchester, Prospective MP for Bethnal Green & Bow

Deadline to sign up by: 31st December 2009

Country: United Kingdom
Postcode area: E1

More details
I want to stand for Parliament in the Bethnal Green & Bow constituency in the next General Election as an independent MP.

I am only able to do so if I am able to raise sufficient funds: a £500.00 deposit plus whatever the campaign expenses total.

Please see http://d-notice.blogspot.com/2009/05/honourable-member-for-bethnal-green-bow.html for more details.
As you can see, the minimum amount that I could raise for the pledge is £500.00, which covers the deposit. Of course the more people that sign it the better.

I also have posters and flyers available (PDF) if you want to spread the word.

18 May 2009

The Honourable Member for Bethnal Green & Bow

Regular readers should have noted that over the past four years I have not been too impressed with the actions of our government and various MPs.

As part of the on-going fallout from the MPs-taking-the-piss-out-of-the-taxpayer-with-their-expenses-claims scandal I've got increasingly more ticked off with our Lords 'n' Masters and have been thinking about what I can do in response.

After reading this article in Liberal Conspiracy - effectively stating that the time is right for more non-party hacks - I've decided that I want to run for Parliament.

Where would I stand?

If I obtain the necessary funds, I would be looking to stand as MP in the Bethnal Green & Bow constituency. I've chose this simply because I live in the Stepney Green/Limehouse area of east London, which it covers. The current MP for the area is George Galloway, but he is not seeking re-election in this area and so it is effectively open for anyone.

What Party would I represent?

According to UKPollingReport Labour, the Lib Dems and Respect have already nominated their candidates. Because it is inner city London, I consider that it is unlikely that the Tories would field a candidate and so they would be wasting their money. Therefore, I would run as an Independent, but any suggestions for party names are welcome, e.g. the Bloggers' Party.

How will I finance it?

Like I said, I do not have the backing of any political party, nor do I have funding from AN Other big donor. Seeing that part of my inspiration for running comes from Sean Tevis (who last year ran for the Kansas state, albeit unsuccessfully) I have decided to copy his model and so will be completely dependant on donations from people on the internet. I am happy to take other donations, however, to make things perfectly clear, I will not be controlled or told what to do by any big donors.

What would I do?

My platform would be based on what I have previously claimed as the Manifesto and my views on the Liberal Democrats' Great Repeal Bill and Freedom Bills.

However, to these I would add the following:
  • All MPs will be limited to a salary of £30,000.00 per year, including expenses, and MPs will be banned from taking any other positions while they are serving - you get into Parliament to help your country, not to get rich - and their subsidised bar will be scrapped;
  • Party whips would be abolished - MPs should vote on what they think, not what they're told to do;
  • Trident, Contactpoint and the NHS IT system will be scrapped;
  • CCTV would be abolished expect for within car parks because it doesn't work;
  • The Church of England will be disestablished and there shall be no taxpayer funding of any religion;
  • Libel laws to be reformed so that there is a presumption of innocence and the aggrieved party has to show loss and malice in order to win their case;
  • All government departments must use open-source software where available, e.g. Ubuntu Linux instead of Windows, OpenOffice.org instead of Microsoft Office and GIMP instead of Adobe Photoshop;
  • The Parliament protest and police photography laws would be abolished (however, Daily Police Photo would remain as a tribute);
  • Cannabis would be downgraded back to a Grade C and Ecstasy would be downgraded to a Grade B, as per the AMCD's advice who would also have a complete say on what to do with other currently-illegal drugs;
Readers of the blog will also know that I have a keen interest in public transport matters and so I propose the following:

London
  • The under-construction Shoreditch High Street station would be zone 2, not zone 1 as planned, with an interchange built with the Central line;
  • The Waterloo & City line would be extended to Paddington station via Victoria, Knightsbridge and Marble Arch with a further station built at Blackfriars;
  • Transport for London would have control of all suburban trains within Greater London and also those local trains which extend slightly outside;
  • The pointless plan for a new version of the Routemaster would be scrapped.
National
  • Extensive electrification of the to-be-nationalised railways would take place;
  • The Manchester Metrolink would be extended via the East Lancashire Railway to Rawtenstall (and possibly Burnley) and it would also be extended to Wigan and Leigh;
  • A train line would be built from Manchester to Burnley to help travel from east Lancashire and one would be built from Uckfield to Lewes as a diversion to for London-Brighton trains;
  • An "M25 train line" would be built encircling Greater London, reducing the need to travel into central London for long-distance train journeys.
I am also happy to listen to any suggestions that people have for things to stand for.

How can people contribute?

If you want to contribute to my election campaign, I've set up a PayPal account using the usual contact address (dnoticeblogATyahooDOTcoDOTuk - amend it in the usual way). Any funds will simply be used to help me get elected and if I am elected any remaining donations will be spent on a post-election thank you piss-up.

UPDATE: I've been asked how much it would cost to stand. It currently costs £500.00 to give a deposit, which would be returned if I obtained a 5% share of the vote. The other main expense would be the costs of running a campaign, but I do not know what these would total.

Hello again!

You may have noticed that I've not written owt for nearly two weeks.

It's not that I've been distracted by real-world/non-t'internet-y stuff - my Twitter feed would disprove that, but I did have two days without any internets - I've just been lacking inspiration and/or bile - which has been a severe problem since the start of the year.

However, today I read summat which has inspired me to write as well as do other things. I'll have more "exiting news" either later today or tomorrow!

You can't wait can you?

7 May 2009

Criminals-to-be and ID card update

On Sunday I mentioned a report in the Observer which said that the government was going to remove innocent people from the DNA database.

I said that there has to be a catch. Thankfully, the government has proven me right. The government has stated that all innocent people's DNA will remain on the register for between 6 and 12 years depending on the severity of the charge that they were innocent of... Mark Thomas calls this "Innocentish", but I prefer to state that we're all Criminals-to-be (C2B).

In more encouraging news, the government seems to be scaling down its ID card scheme: instead of having specialised processing facilities, it'll be relying on place like Boots to obtain people's details and the good folks of Manchester - hello family! - will be the first ones to have the "pleasure" in registering for the system. I'm not sure if this is a response to the pilots voting to boycott the scheme.

The Home Office has also stated that ID cards will cost over £5 billion but claims that it will result in "up to £6 billion" of benefits, albeit over a period of 30 years. While this suggests that they are in fact value for money - assuming the government's figures are accurate - the general rule for spending public money is that there needs to be a BCR (benefit-cost ratio; the gains that result from each £1 spent) of at least 1.5. A gain of up to £6 billion against a cost of over £5 billion is a BCR of approximately 1.0 and so no more money should be allocated to the scheme on the grounds that it completely wasteful. I fully expect that the government will be consistent with its funding rules and therefore that ID cards will scrapped imminently...

UPDATE: Just found out, thanks to the Guardian's Liberty Central, that the Home Office are doing a public consultation on the DNA database, but it appears that the documents can't be downloaded!

3 May 2009

England are doomed

I was thinking of putting this on The Sun - Tabloid Lies, but decided against it for obvious reasons.
In Saturday's Sun there's an interview with "actor"/"comedian" James Corden. He states that he's been asked to do a cover version of New Order's classic song World In Motion, in my view best football-related song ever, as the official England song for next year's World Cup.

Aside from the fact it once again shows a complete lack of music taste on behalf of the FA, I think it's a bit presumptuous for him to be asked to do this when England haven't yet qualified, especially when last month the Sun was saying England are doomed due to a potential lack of Wayne Rooney. If it's one thing I've learnt from being a long-suffering football fan, it's not to count your chickens. Although, I'll admit that it is likely that England will qualify in the next few months.
Let's hope that it's not a jinx of an article and that it's better than his recent flop of a vampire film, but I'm not holding out much hope....

So long DNA database?

Today's Observer has a strange and frankly shocking article: the government WILL be complying with the Euro Human Rights Court regarding the DNA database and it WILL be destroying all samples of innocent people.

I'm happy to give credit to the government for finally accepting that innocent people shouldn't have their DNA stored. However, there's gotta be a catch somewhere, hasn't there?