I
found this on the Sun while looking for articles to rip into:
Regulating quacks helps them prey on gullible patients
Herbal medicine and acupuncture face new Government controls, health minister Ann Keen announced earlier this week.
"Patient safety is paramount," she says adding that the Government wants to introduce safeguards to ensure anyone offering the alternative remedies meets "professional standards of care and safety".
It sounds sensible but it's actually a charter for licensed quackery.
Unlike doctors, herbalists and acupuncturists won't have to provide proof their treatments work.
Anything that gives an official seal of approval to alternative medicine is bound to increase its credibility and popularity. And that is why regulation is far from sensible.
As Britain's leading expert on alternative medicine, Professor Edzard Ernst points out: "If you regulate nonsense, it is still nonsense."
And NHS cash is wasted on homeopathy - also known as sugar pills and "magic" water - another example of the way regulation adds an aura of respectability to unproven treatments.
Homeopathic "remedies" are licensed by the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Authority. But Professor Michael Baum, of University College London, says: "This is like licensing a witches' brew as a medicine so long as the bat wings are sterile."
I'm not mentioning it on
the Sun Lies, because the Sun is absolutely right with the complete disdain it shows to the plans.
This, however, is the killer quote:
We all had a laugh at the flu advice given to Russian football fans - "Drink a lot of Welsh whisky as a form of disinfection".
But thousands of Brits are still swallowing homeopathy and other unproven remedies - and I know which one I would rather down.
I can only hope that their coverage of other
science and
health topics will be of a similar standard.